I believe in courtship. In love and in life. I wholeheartedly endorse it.
Inquisitive passer-by: “Courtship, huh? Isn’t that an antiquated term for dating, circa Jane Austen?”
Lindsay the Letter Writer: “Who says old-timey things are bad? Have you not seen Downton Abbey? That stuff’s legit right now.”
Inquisitive passer-by: “Well played, Auntie Quated. Well played.”
If I believe in a living Savior from 2,000 years ago, it makes perfect sense that I’d follow a concept from the 1500s, as well. 😉
Courtship is more than a guided process of a man wooing a woman. It’s also the practice of testing out new things.
I think the 90-day new-hire probationary period is a form of courtship. The employer is checking to see if the employee really is qualified. And the employee is discovering whether or not they fit in at their new job.
We’ve got buyer’s remorse, so you can even court a car.
Or that 60-day money back guarantee. Courting a product.
So why’s it so weird that a man would court a woman? What’s wrong with trusted leaders with experience in a marriage relationship guiding people they love through a journey of discovery?
If 50% of marriages allegedly fail, perhaps society should change their pre-marital approach.
Of all the marriages I’ve seen that first went through a courtship, 100% of them have succeeded.
I’m reporting my findings of watching this hypothetical love and basketball game between dating and courtship. The full court pressing in of courtship dominates the casual game plan of dating.
So, I choose courtship. Even if it means I’ve been single for 27 years. Even if both of my younger siblings are in a relationship and I’m not. Because if waiting for the one right man means a better marriage for me later, I’ll wait.